Xeon L5609
VS
A8-7670K

Xeon L5609 vs A8-7670K

Intel

Xeon L5609

4 Cores4 Thrd40 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A8-7670K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5609 is positioned at rank 735 and the A8-7670K is on rank 628, so the A8-7670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14432%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2725%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2421%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1870%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
100%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
99%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
100%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#747
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#748
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7670K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11257%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10637%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7723%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2327%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1843%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1612%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
923%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
911%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
830%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
830%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
820%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
798%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
787%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
784%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
777%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
99%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
100%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
100%
#633
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
99%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
98%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
98%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($229) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5609 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon L5609A8-7670K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($43)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-7670K ($43), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($186 less, 81% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon L5609A8-7670K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+428%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($43)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5609 and A8-7670K

Intel

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

A8-7670K

The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon L5609 and A8-7670K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 versus 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K — a 70.8% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon L5609 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-7670K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5609 scores 3,298 against the A8-7670K's 3,267 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon L5609.

FeatureXeon L5609A8-7670K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
3.9 GHz+110%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
3.6 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark
3,298
3,267
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5609 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-7670K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5609A8-7670K
Socket
LGA1366
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
2133
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L5609) / true (A8-7670K). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Xeon L5609 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.

FeatureXeon L5609A8-7670K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon L5609 launched at $229 MSRP, while the A8-7670K debuted at $118. At current prices ($229 vs $43), the A8-7670K is $186 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon L5609 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 76.0 pts/$ for the A8-7670K — making the A8-7670K the 136.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon L5609A8-7670K
MSRP
$229
$118-48%
Avg Price (30d)
$229
$43-81%
Performance per Dollar
14.4
76.0+428%
Release Date
2010
2015