Xeon L5609
VS
PRO A8-9600

Xeon L5609 vs PRO A8-9600

Intel

Xeon L5609

4 Cores4 Thrd40 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010
VS
AMD

PRO A8-9600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5609 is positioned at rank 735 and the PRO A8-9600 is on rank 319, so the PRO A8-9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14432%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2725%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2421%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1870%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
100%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
99%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
100%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#747
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#748
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A8-9600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4697%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4439%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3223%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
971%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
769%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
673%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
385%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
380%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
346%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
346%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
333%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
328%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
327%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
324%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
99%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
99%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
99%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#319
PRO A8-9600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The PRO A8-9600 (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon L5609PRO A8-9600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon L5609 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon L5609PRO A8-9600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5609 and PRO A8-9600

Intel

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

PRO A8-9600

The PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,318 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon L5609 and PRO A8-9600 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A8-9600 — a 58.6% clock advantage for the PRO A8-9600 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon L5609 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A8-9600 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5609 scores 3,298 against the PRO A8-9600's 3,318 — a 0.6% lead for the PRO A8-9600.

FeatureXeon L5609PRO A8-9600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
3.4 GHz+83%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
3.1 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,298
3,318
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5609 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A8-9600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5609PRO A8-9600
Socket
LGA1366
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%