Xeon L5609
VS
Core i3-6100E

Xeon L5609 vs Core i3-6100E

Intel

Xeon L5609

4 Cores4 Thrd40 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i3-6100E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5609 is positioned at rank 735 and the Core i3-6100E is on rank 902, so the Xeon L5609 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14432%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2725%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2421%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1870%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
100%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
99%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
100%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#747
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#748
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6100E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21162%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14519%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4374%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3031%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1736%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1713%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1560%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1560%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1542%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1501%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1480%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1474%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1460%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
100%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
98%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
98%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
97%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
96%
#913
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
96%
#914
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
96%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
96%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
96%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($229) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5609 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon L5609Core i3-6100E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-6100E ($50), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($179 less, 78% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon L5609Core i3-6100E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+360%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5609 and Core i3-6100E

Intel

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i3-6100E

The Core i3-6100E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,315 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Xeon L5609 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-6100E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5609 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-6100E — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-6100E. The Xeon L5609 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6100E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5609 scores 3,298 against the Core i3-6100E's 3,315 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-6100E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5609 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6100E.

FeatureXeon L5609Core i3-6100E
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
2.7 GHz+45%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+300%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,298
3,315
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon L5609) / true (Core i3-6100E). The Core i3-6100E includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon L5609 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon L5609Core i3-6100E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon L5609 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Core i3-6100E debuted at $225. At current prices ($229 vs $50), the Core i3-6100E is $179 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon L5609 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 66.3 pts/$ for the Core i3-6100E — making the Core i3-6100E the 128.6% better value option.

FeatureXeon L5609Core i3-6100E
MSRP
$229
$225-2%
Avg Price (30d)
$229
$50-78%
Performance per Dollar
14.4
66.3+360%
Release Date
2010
2015