CPU
GPU
Xeon L5609
FX-4150
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon L5609 is positioned at rank 735 and the FX-4150 is on rank 702, so the FX-4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609
Performance Per Dollar FX-4150
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon L5609 | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($229) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon L5609 | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1055%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($229) | ✅ More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5609 and FX-4150
Xeon L5609
The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.
FX-4150
The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon L5609 and FX-4150 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 73% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon L5609 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5609 scores 3,298 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-4150. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5609 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-4150.
| Feature | Xeon L5609 | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.86 GHz | 4 GHz+115% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | 3.8 GHz+104% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 3,298 | 3,327 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon L5609 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon L5609 | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon L5609 launched at $229 MSRP, while the FX-4150 debuted at $137. At current prices ($229 vs $20), the FX-4150 is $209 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon L5609 delivers 14.4 pts/$ vs 166.3 pts/$ for the FX-4150 — making the FX-4150 the 168.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon L5609 | FX-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | $137-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $229 | $20-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.4 | 166.3+1055% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon L5609 and FX-4150
