Xeon L5609
VS
Ryzen Embedded R1600

Xeon L5609 vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Xeon L5609

4 Cores4 Thrd40 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon L5609 is positioned at rank #735 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14432%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2725%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2421%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1870%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
100%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
99%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
100%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#747
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#748
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1600 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon L5609Ryzen Embedded R1600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon L5609 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon L5609Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon L5609 and Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon L5609 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5609 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1600 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon L5609 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon L5609 scores 3,298 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon L5609. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5609 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1600.

FeatureXeon L5609Ryzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.86 GHz
3.1 GHz+67%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
2.6 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,298
3,276
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon L5609 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon L5609Ryzen Embedded R1600
Socket
LGA1366
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon L5609 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 debuted at $0. At current prices ($229 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is $229 cheaper.

FeatureXeon L5609Ryzen Embedded R1600
MSRP
$229
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$229
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
14.4
Release Date
2010
2020