Xeon Platinum 8160M vs EPYC 9174F
Xeon Platinum 8160M
EPYC 9174F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8160M
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8160M | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8160M | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1047%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($350) | ✅ More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8160M and EPYC 9174F
Xeon Platinum 8160M
The Xeon Platinum 8160M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 53,158 points. Launch price was $7,704.
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8160M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9174F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160M versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9174F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160M uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 9174F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8160M scores 53,158 against the EPYC 9174F's 52,249 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160M. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160M vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160M | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz+95% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB | 256 MB (total)+676% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 53,158+2% | 52,249 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8160M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 9174F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160M versus 4800 on the EPYC 9174F — the EPYC 9174F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs 12 (EPYC 9174F). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs 128 (EPYC 9174F) — the EPYC 9174F offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) and SP5 (EPYC 9174F).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160M | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB+26214300% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 12+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 128+167% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8160M targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160M rivals EPYC 7401; EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160M | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Datacenter | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8160M launched at $5000 MSRP, while the EPYC 9174F debuted at $194. At current prices ($350 vs $30), the EPYC 9174F is $320 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8160M delivers 151.9 pts/$ vs 1741.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9174F — making the EPYC 9174F the 167.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8160M | EPYC 9174F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5000 | $194-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $350 | $30-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 151.9 | 1741.6+1047% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8160M and EPYC 9174F
