PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon w7-3455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon w7-3455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8160M

2017

Why buy it

✅+690.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 150W instead of 270W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 68 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3455 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w7-3455

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+104.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Costs $2,511 less on MSRP ($2,489 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 107.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.1 vs 10.6 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 15,000).
❌80% higher power demand at 270W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w7-3455 better than Xeon Platinum 8160M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w7-3455 is ahead with a 28.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8160M pulls ahead with 690.3% better Geekbench multi-core. Xeon w7-3455 also has the bigger cache pool with 104.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8160M is the stronger fit. You are getting 690.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w7-3455 is the better buy right now. Xeon w7-3455 comes in $2,511 cheaper on MSRP at $2,489 MSRP versus $5,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8160M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 690.3% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 107.6% better value on MSRP (22.1 vs 10.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w7-3455 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and 104.5% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 33 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon w7-3455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8160M

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 53,158 points. Launch price was $7,704.

Xeon w7-3455

The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Platinum 8160M and Xeon w7-3455 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160M versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3455 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160M uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8160M scores 53,158 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 — a 3.3% lead for the Xeon w7-3455. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 1,900, a 76.4% lead for the Xeon w7-3455 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 1,898 (155.1% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8160M). L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160M vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon w7-3455
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	24 / 48
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	33 MB	67.5 MB+105%
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	53,158	54,925+3%
Geekbench 6 Single	850	1,900+124%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000+690%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8160M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160M versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3455 — the Xeon w7-3455 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3455 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3455). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) — the Xeon w7-3455 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon w7-3455
Socket	LGA3647	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	4096 GB+167%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	112+133%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w7-3455 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8160M targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160M rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon w7-3455
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Datacenter	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8160M was priced at $5000, while the Xeon w7-3455 came in at $2489. On launch pricing ($5000 vs $2489), Xeon w7-3455 was $2511 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8160M delivers 10.6 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 — making the Xeon w7-3455 the 69.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon w7-3455
MSRP	$5000	$2489-50%
Performance per Dollar	10.6	22.1+108%
Release Date	2017	2023

Search Xeon Platinum 8160M on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-3455 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.