Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon Platinum 8358

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon Platinum 8358 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon Platinum 8358: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8160M

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8358 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (53,158 vs 54,416).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $4,607 MSRP).

Xeon Platinum 8358

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Costs $393 less on MSRP ($4,607 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.8 vs 10.6 PassMark/$ ($4,607 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8358 better than Xeon Platinum 8160M?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8358 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8358 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8358 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8358 is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8358 comes in $393 cheaper on MSRP at $4,607 MSRP versus $5,000 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.1% better value on MSRP (11.8 vs 10.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8358 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), 45.5% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 33 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Platinum 8160M vs Xeon Platinum 8358 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8160M

The Xeon Platinum 8160M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 53,158 points. Launch price was $7,704.

Xeon Platinum 8358

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,416 points. Launch price was $3,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8160M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8358 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160M versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8160M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160M uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8160M scores 53,158 against the Xeon Platinum 8358's 54,416 — a 2.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8358. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160M vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8358.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon Platinum 8358
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	33 MB	48 MB (total)+45%
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	53,158	54,416+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	850	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8160M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8358 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160M versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8358 — the Xeon Platinum 8358 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8358 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1536 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8358). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8358) — the Xeon Platinum 8358 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160M) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8358).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon Platinum 8358
Socket	LGA3647	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	4096 GB+167%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	64+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8160M targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160M rivals EPYC 7401; Xeon Platinum 8358 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon Platinum 8358
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Datacenter	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8160M was priced at $5000, while the Xeon Platinum 8358 came in at $4607. On launch pricing ($5000 vs $4607), Xeon Platinum 8358 was $393 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8160M delivers 10.6 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8358 — making the Xeon Platinum 8358 the 10.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8160M	Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP	$5000	$4607-8%
Performance per Dollar	10.6	11.8+11%
Release Date	2017	2021

Search Xeon Platinum 8160M on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8358 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.