Xeon Platinum 8168
VS
Ryzen 9 3900XT

Xeon Platinum 8168 vs Ryzen 9 3900XT

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8168

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 3900XT

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8168

#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
125%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
124%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
113%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
113%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
109%
#29
Xeon Platinum 8168
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#41
Xeon W-2195
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900XT

#220
Athlon PRO 300GE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
104%
#221
Athlon Gold 3150G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
104%
#222
Core i7-9800X
MSRP: $589|Avg: $210
104%
#223
Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $235
103%
#224
Ryzen 9 5900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $395
103%
#225
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
MSRP: $299|Avg: $300
103%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
63%
#226
Core i5-14500T
MSRP: $232|Avg: $267
103%
#227
Core i5-12600
MSRP: $233|Avg: $250
103%
#228
Core i7-11700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $180
103%
#229
Core i5-10600
MSRP: $244|Avg: $159
102%
#230
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
MSRP: $193|Avg: $100
102%
#231
Core i7-8700B
MSRP: $303|Avg: $139
102%
#232
Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $80
101%
#233
Core i3-9100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $80
101%
#234
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
MSRP: $479|Avg: $479
100%
#235
Ryzen 9 3900XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $390
100%
#236
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
99%
#237
Core i7-14700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $384
99%
#238
Core i3-13100TE
MSRP: $137|Avg: $137
98%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
98%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
97%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
97%
#242
Celeron G6900E
MSRP: $53|Avg: $53
97%
#243
Core i3-12300T
MSRP: $209|Avg: $164
96%
#244
Core i9-12900
MSRP: $519|Avg: $420
96%
#245
Ryzen 3 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
96%
#246
Core i7-11700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $299
96%
#247
Core i5-10600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $179
95%
#248
Core i3-10325
MSRP: $154|Avg: $130
95%
#249
Ryzen Embedded V2718
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Platinum 8168 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon Platinum 8168Ryzen 9 3900XT
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($390)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse 2 (2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 3900XT ($390), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($390 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon Platinum 8168Ryzen 9 3900XT
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($390)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8168 and Ryzen 9 3900XT

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8168

The Xeon Platinum 8168 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 32,373 points. Launch price was $5,890.

AMD

Ryzen 9 3900XT

The Ryzen 9 3900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 32,512 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8168 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900XT offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8168 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8168 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900XT — a 23.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8168 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT uses Matisse 2 (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8168 scores 32,373 against the Ryzen 9 3900XT's 32,512 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900XT. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8168 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900XT.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8168Ryzen 9 3900XT
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+100%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz+41%
L3 Cache
33 MB
64 MB+94%
L2 Cache
24 MB+4700%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Matisse 2 (2020)
PassMark
32,373
32,512
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,400
Geekbench 6 Single
1,750
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8168 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8168 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900XT — the Xeon Platinum 8168 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8168 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8168) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 3900XT). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8168) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) — the Xeon Platinum 8168 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Platinum 8168) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900XT).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8168Ryzen 9 3900XT
Socket
LGA3647
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
2666+66550%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
768
128 GB+17476167%
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
48+100%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 3900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8168 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8168) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900XT targets Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8168 rivals EPYC 7501; Ryzen 9 3900XT rivals Core i9-10900K.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8168Ryzen 9 3900XT
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming