Xeon Platinum 8180 vs Xeon W-3335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8180 vs Xeon W-3335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8180 vs Xeon W-3335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8180

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Draws 205W instead of 250W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,259 vs 39,293).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($10,009 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $8,579 less on MSRP ($1,430 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Delivers 618.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8180 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 39 MB).
❌22% higher power demand at 250W vs 205W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3335 better than Xeon Platinum 8180?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8180 is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3335 pulls ahead with 2.7% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8180 also has the bigger cache pool with 60.4% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3335 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3335 comes in $8,579 cheaper on MSRP at $1,430 MSRP versus $10,009 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8180 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 618.8% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Platinum 8180 vs Xeon W-3335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8180

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 38,259 points. Launch price was $10,009.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8180 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3335 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8180 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8180 scores 38,259 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 2.7% lead for the Xeon W-3335. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8180	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	28 / 56+75%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.4 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	38.5 MB (total)+60%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	38,259	39,293+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8180 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180 versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the Xeon W-3335 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C621 (Xeon Platinum 8180) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8180	Xeon W-3335
Socket	LGA3647	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	4096 GB+433%
RAM Channels	6	8+33%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	64+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Platinum 8180) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8180	Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8180 was priced at $10009, while the Xeon W-3335 came in at $1430. On launch pricing ($10009 vs $1430), Xeon W-3335 was $8579 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8180 delivers 3.8 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Xeon W-3335 the 151.2% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8180	Xeon W-3335
MSRP	$10009	$1430-86%
Performance per Dollar	3.8	27.5+624%
Release Date	2017	2021

Search Xeon Platinum 8180 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.