EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8180

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7313

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8180

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7313

16 / 32

38,938

+1.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8180

28 / 56

38,259

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8180 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Costs $8,926 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Delivers 840.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 3.8 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $10,009 MSRP).
✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8180 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Platinum 8180

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,259 vs 38,938).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($10,009 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7313 better than Xeon Platinum 8180?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8180 is ahead with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313 pulls ahead with 1.8% better PassMark. EPYC 7313 also has the bigger cache pool with 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7313 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7313 is the better buy right now. EPYC 7313 comes in $8,926 cheaper on MSRP at $1,083 MSRP versus $10,009 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8180 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 12.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 840.6% better value on MSRP (36.0 vs 3.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 7313 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017), 232.5% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 39 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 28/56. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 7313 vs Xeon Platinum 8180 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

Xeon Platinum 8180

The Xeon Platinum 8180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 38,259 points. Launch price was $10,009.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7313 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8180 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the Xeon Platinum 8180's 38,259 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 7313. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon Platinum 8180
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	28 / 56+75%
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+232%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	38,938+2%	38,259
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,736	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,264	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8180 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180 — the EPYC 7313 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7313) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8180). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180) — the EPYC 7313 offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and Intel C621 (Xeon Platinum 8180).

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon Platinum 8180
Socket	SP3	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+20%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+433%	768 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) / not specified (Xeon Platinum 8180). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon Platinum 8180
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU	—
Target Use	Server / High-load computing	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7313 was priced at $1083, while the Xeon Platinum 8180 came in at $10009. On launch pricing ($1083 vs $10009), EPYC 7313 was $8926 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 36.0 pts/$ vs 3.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8180 — making the EPYC 7313 the 161.6% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 7313	Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP	$1083-89%	$10009
Performance per Dollar	36.0+847%	3.8
Release Date	2021	2017

Search EPYC 7313 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8180 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.