EPYC 7313 vs Xeon W-3335
EPYC 7313
Xeon W-3335
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7313
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3335
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7313 | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($764) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7313 | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+56%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($764) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335
EPYC 7313
The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.
Xeon W-3335
The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3335 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-3335. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+433% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 38,938 | 39,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,736 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,264 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7313 versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the Xeon W-3335 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the EPYC 7313 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server / High-load computing | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7313 launched at $1083 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3335 debuted at $1430. At current prices ($764 vs $1200), the EPYC 7313 is $436 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 51.0 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the EPYC 7313 the 43.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Xeon W-3335 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1083-24% | $1430 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $764-36% | $1200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.0+56% | 32.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7313 and Xeon W-3335
