EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

AMD

EPYC 7313

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

12 Cores24 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022
Threadripper Pro family
···

EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7313

2021

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Costs $1,316 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 115.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 16.7 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • Draws 155W instead of 280W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (38,938 vs 40,126).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +41.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.7 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
  • 80.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 155W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX better than EPYC 7313?
Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 41.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 41.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7313 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX comes in 121.5% more expensive on MSRP at $2,399 MSRP versus $1,083 MSRP, and it still gives you a 41.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7313 is also 115.0% better value on MSRP (36.0 vs 16.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7313 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7313

The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 40,126 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7313 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7313 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX — a 19.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX (base: 3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX's 40,126 — a 3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX.

FeatureEPYC 7313Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+33%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz+22%
Base Clock
3 GHz
4.1 GHz+37%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+100%
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Chagall PRO (2022)
PassMark
38,938
40,126+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,736
Geekbench 6 Multi
15,264
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX).

FeatureEPYC 7313Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Socket
SP3
sWRX8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+100%
2048 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX rivals Xeon W-3335.

FeatureEPYC 7313Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use
Server / High-load computing
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7313 was priced at $1083, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($1083 vs $2399), EPYC 7313 was $1316 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 36.0 pts/$ vs 16.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX — making the EPYC 7313 the 73% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7313Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP
$1083-55%
$2399
Performance per Dollar
36.0+116%
16.7
Release Date
2021
2022

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.