Xeon Platinum 8260L vs Xeon X5677
Xeon Platinum 8260L
Xeon X5677
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon Platinum 8260L is positioned at rank 1030 and the Xeon X5677 is on rank 550, so the Xeon X5677 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260L
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5677
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8260L | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($750) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8260L | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($750) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8260L and Xeon X5677
Xeon Platinum 8260L
The Xeon Platinum 8260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,103 points. Launch price was $12,599.
Xeon X5677
The Xeon X5677 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.46 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,054 points. Launch price was $350.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8260L packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon X5677 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260L has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260L versus 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X5677 — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260L (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.46 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8260L uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5677 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8260L scores 5,103 against the Xeon X5677's 5,054 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260L. L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8260L vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5677.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260L | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+500% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+5% | 3.73 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.46 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB+198% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+9500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 5,103 | 5,054 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8260L uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5677 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260L versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5677 — the Xeon Platinum 8260L supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260L) vs 3 (Xeon X5677).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260L | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933+97667% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4608 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6+100% | 3 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Xeon Platinum 8260L) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5677). Primary use case: Xeon X5677 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5677 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260L | Xeon X5677 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8260L and Xeon X5677
