
Core i7-4702MQ

Xeon Platinum 8260L
Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon Platinum 8260L Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon Platinum 8260L FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon Platinum 8260L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4702MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $7,117 less on MSRP ($383 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1890.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0.7 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $7,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 165W, a 128W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Xeon Platinum 8260L needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8260L across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8260L, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8260L
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+346.9% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,103 vs 5,187).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($7,500 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ❌345.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 37W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4702MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4702MQ better than Xeon Platinum 8260L?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4702MQ vs Xeon Platinum 8260L Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4702MQ
The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon Platinum 8260L
The Xeon Platinum 8260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 5,103 points. Launch price was $12,599.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4702MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260L has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260L — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260L (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-4702MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4702MQ scores 5,187 against the Xeon Platinum 8260L's 5,103 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-4702MQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4702MQ vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8260L.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 24 / 48+500% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+347% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+967% | 24 MB |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 5,187+2% | 5,103 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 965 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,180 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4702MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-4702MQ versus 2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260L — the Xeon Platinum 8260L supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8260L supports up to 4608 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 14300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-4702MQ) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260L). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-4702MQ) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260L) — the Xeon Platinum 8260L offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | 2933+83% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 4608 GB+14300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ) vs true (Xeon Platinum 8260L). The Core i7-4702MQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon Platinum 8260L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4702MQ was priced at $383, while the Xeon Platinum 8260L came in at $7500. On launch pricing ($383 vs $7500), Core i7-4702MQ was $7117 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4702MQ delivers 13.5 pts/$ vs 0.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8260L — making the Core i7-4702MQ the 180.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Xeon Platinum 8260L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $383-95% | $7500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5+1829% | 0.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














