Core i7-4702MQ
VS
Opteron 6272

Core i7-4702MQ vs Opteron 6272

Intel

Core i7-4702MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd37 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Opteron 6272

16 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4702MQ is positioned at rank 1011 and the Opteron 6272 is on rank 65, so the Opteron 6272 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4702MQ

#999
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2167%
#1000
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2135%
#1001
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1960%
#1002
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1951%
#1003
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1933%
#1005
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1867%
#1006
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1790%
#1007
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1787%
#1008
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1739%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
99%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
97%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
94%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
92%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6272

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1586%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
300%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
266%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
206%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
96%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
92%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
92%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
87%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
87%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
87%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
84%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
84%
#65
Opteron 6272
MSRP: $523|Avg: $50
100%
#71
Opteron 6220
MSRP: $523|Avg: $239
91%
#79
Opteron 3380
MSRP: $229|Avg: $427
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-4702MQ leads in gaming performance. However, the Opteron 6272 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-4702MQOpteron 6272
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Opteron 6272 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($50 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-4702MQOpteron 6272
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4702MQ and Opteron 6272

Intel

Core i7-4702MQ

The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Opteron 6272

The Opteron 6272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,240 points. Launch price was $325.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4702MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6272 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6272 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ versus 3 GHz on the Opteron 6272 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4702MQ (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4702MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6272 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4702MQ scores 5,187 against the Opteron 6272's 5,240 — a 1% lead for the Opteron 6272. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQOpteron 6272
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+5%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8.00391 MB (per core)+3102%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark
5,187
5,240+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
965
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4702MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6272 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQOpteron 6272
Socket
PGA946
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ) / not specified (Opteron 6272). The Core i7-4702MQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 6272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQOpteron 6272
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4702MQ launched at $383 MSRP, while the Opteron 6272 debuted at $523. At current prices ($50 vs $50), the Opteron 6272 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4702MQ delivers 103.7 pts/$ vs 104.8 pts/$ for the Opteron 6272 — making the Opteron 6272 the 1% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4702MQOpteron 6272
MSRP
$383-27%
$523
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
103.7
104.8+1%
Release Date
2013
2011