
Core i7-4702MQ

Opteron 6272
Core i7-4702MQ vs Opteron 6272 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-4702MQ vs Opteron 6272 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-4702MQ vs Opteron 6272: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-4702MQ
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($383 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($383 MSRP vs $523 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 37W instead of 115W, a 78W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Opteron 6272 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6272 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,187 vs 5,240).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6272, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6272
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 13.5 PassMark/$ ($523 MSRP vs $383 MSRP).
- ❌210.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 37W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-4702MQ can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6272 better than Core i7-4702MQ?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-4702MQ vs Opteron 6272 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4702MQ
The Core i7-4702MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,187 points. Launch price was $378.

Opteron 6272
The Opteron 6272 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8.00391 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,240 points. Launch price was $325.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4702MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6272 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6272 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4702MQ versus 3 GHz on the Opteron 6272 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-4702MQ (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4702MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6272 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4702MQ scores 5,187 against the Opteron 6272's 5,240 — a 1% lead for the Opteron 6272. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+3098% | 8.00391 MB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 5,187 | 5,240+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 965 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,180 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4702MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6272 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-4702MQ) / not specified (Opteron 6272). The Core i7-4702MQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 6272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-4702MQ targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-4702MQ rivals Ryzen 7 3750H.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-4702MQ was priced at $383, while the Opteron 6272 came in at $523. On launch pricing ($383 vs $523), Core i7-4702MQ was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4702MQ delivers 13.5 pts/$ vs 10.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 6272 — making the Core i7-4702MQ the 29.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4702MQ | Opteron 6272 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $383-27% | $523 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5+35% | 10.0 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















