
Xeon Platinum 8260M vs Xeon Platinum 8270

Xeon Platinum 8260M

Xeon Platinum 8270
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8260M
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8270
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8260M | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705) | ✅ More affordable ($7,405) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake-SP (2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8260M | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,705) | ✅ More affordable ($7,405) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8260M and Xeon Platinum 8270

Xeon Platinum 8260M
The Xeon Platinum 8260M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,970 points. Launch price was $7,705.

Xeon Platinum 8270
The Xeon Platinum 8270 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,602 points. Launch price was $7,405.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8260M packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8270 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260M versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8270 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 33,970 against the Xeon Platinum 8270's 33,602 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 30,500 vs 32,000 (4.8% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,200 vs 1,200, a 0% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8270 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,491 vs 11,000 (4.7% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8270). Both processors carry 35.75 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260M | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 26 / 52+8% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB (total) | 35.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 33,970+1% | 33,602 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 30,500 | 32,000+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,200 | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,491 | 11,000+5% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8260M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621,C622,C624,C627,C628 (Xeon Platinum 8260M) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8270).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260M | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+100% | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8260M targets Server (Memory Optimized), Xeon Platinum 8270 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8260M rivals Xeon Platinum 8268; Xeon Platinum 8270 rivals Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260M | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Server (Memory Optimized) | Server / Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8260M launched at $7705 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8270 debuted at $7405.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260M | Xeon Platinum 8270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7705 | $7405-4% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















