Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs EPYC 9115
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
EPYC 9115
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9115
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | EPYC 9115 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,719) | ✅ More affordable ($726) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | EPYC 9115 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1001%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($7,719) | ✅ More affordable ($726) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 9115
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.
EPYC 9115
The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the EPYC 9115 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9115 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 9115 uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q scores 46,681 against the EPYC 9115's 48,343 — a 3.5% lead for the EPYC 9115. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | EPYC 9115 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76+138% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+12% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 46,681 | 48,343+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9115 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus 4800 on the EPYC 9115 — the EPYC 9115 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) vs 12 (EPYC 9115). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) and SP5 (EPYC 9115).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | EPYC 9115 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 6144+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | EPYC 9115 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q launched at $7719 MSRP, while the EPYC 9115 debuted at $726. At current prices ($7719 vs $726), the EPYC 9115 is $6993 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368Q delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 66.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9115 — making the EPYC 9115 the 166.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | EPYC 9115 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7719 | $726-91% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $7719 | $726-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 66.6+1010% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8368Q and EPYC 9115
