PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+48.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 39 MB).
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3175X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,720 less on MSRP ($2,999 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 154.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 255W instead of 270W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (46,125 vs 46,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 57 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3175X better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3175X is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8368Q also has the bigger cache pool with 48.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 48.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3175X is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3175X comes in $4,720 cheaper on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 154.3% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8368Q makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018), 48.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 39 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 38 cores / 76 threads instead of 28/56. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3175X (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q scores 46,681 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368Q	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	38 / 76+36%	28 / 56
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.1 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	57 MB (total)+48%	38.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	46,681+1%	46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,350
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,358

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368Q	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	LGA4189	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+20%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB+700%	512 GB
RAM Channels	8+33%	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+167%	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon W-3175X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368Q	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q was priced at $7719, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($7719 vs $2999), Xeon W-3175X was $4720 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368Q delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Xeon W-3175X the 87.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368Q	Xeon W-3175X
MSRP	$7719	$2999-61%
Performance per Dollar	6.0	15.4+157%
Release Date	2021	2018

Search Xeon Platinum 8368Q on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3175X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.