EPYC 9115 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9115

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2024

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9115 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9115

16 / 32

48,343

+3.6%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 / 76

46,681

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9115 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9115 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9115

2024

Why buy it

✅+3.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $6,993 less on MSRP ($726 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1001.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($726 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8368Q across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,343).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 66.6 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $726 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9115 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9115 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is ahead with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9115 pulls ahead with 3.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9115 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9115 is the better buy right now. EPYC 9115 comes in $6,993 cheaper on MSRP at $726 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1001.1% better value on MSRP (66.6 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9115 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9115 vs Xeon Platinum 8368Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9115

The EPYC 9115 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,343 points. Launch price was $726.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9115 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 9115 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 10.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9115 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 9115 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9115 scores 48,343 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 3.5% lead for the EPYC 9115. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9115 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Feature	EPYC 9115	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	38 / 76+138%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+11%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+12%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-60%	10 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	48,343+4%	46,681

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9115 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9115 versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the EPYC 9115 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9115 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9115) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9115) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

Feature	EPYC 9115	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800+50%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9115) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). Direct competitor: EPYC 9115 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	EPYC 9115	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9115 was priced at $726, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q came in at $7719. On launch pricing ($726 vs $7719), EPYC 9115 was $6993 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9115 delivers 66.6 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the EPYC 9115 the 166.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9115	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP	$726-91%	$7719
Performance per Dollar	66.6+1010%	6.0
Release Date	2024	2021

Search EPYC 9115 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.