
Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Xeon W-3345
Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3345 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3345 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3345: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,140).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Xeon W-3345
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,220 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 218.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 270W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3345 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3345 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3345
The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon W-3345 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3345 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q scores 46,681 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 — a 3.1% lead for the Xeon W-3345. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76+58% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total)+58% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 46,681 | 48,140+3% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q was priced at $7719, while the Xeon W-3345 came in at $2499. On launch pricing ($7719 vs $2499), Xeon W-3345 was $5220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368Q delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 — making the Xeon W-3345 the 104.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7719 | $2499-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 19.3+222% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















