Xeon Platinum 8570 vs Xeon w9-3495X

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Xeon w9-3495X

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
Similar parts

Xeon Platinum 8570 vs Xeon w9-3495X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8570 vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8570 vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+185.7% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 105 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (65,000 vs 72,560).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Costs $3,706 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 57.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
  • βœ…40% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (105 MB vs 300 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Xeon Platinum 8570?
Yes. Xeon w9-3495X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3495X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3495X is the stronger fit. You are getting 11.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon w9-3495X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3495X comes in $3,706 cheaper on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $9,595 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 57.2% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon w9-3495X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 56/112. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Xeon Platinum 8570 vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

Intel

Xeon w9-3495X

The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚑

Processing Power

Both the Xeon Platinum 8570 and Xeon w9-3495X share an identical 56-core/112-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X β€” a 18.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8570 uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8570 scores 93,722 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 β€” a 3.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 65,000 vs 72,560 (11% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 1,960 vs 2,136, a 8.6% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,960 vs 18,600 (1.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570). L3 cache: 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570 vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8570Xeon w9-3495X
Cores / Threads
56 / 112
56 / 112
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.8 GHz+20%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+11%
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
300 MB (total)+186%
105 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Emerald Rapids (2023)
Sapphire Rapids (2023βˆ’2024)
PassMark
93,722+4%
90,441
Cinebench R23 Multi
65,000
72,560+12%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,960
2,136+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,960+2%
18,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X β€” the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) β€” the Xeon w9-3495X offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8570Xeon w9-3495X
Socket
LGA4677
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+17%
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
4 TB
4096 GB
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
80
112+40%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8570Xeon w9-3495X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Server
Ultimate Workstation
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8570 was priced at $9595, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($9595 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3495X was $3706 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8570 delivers 9.8 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X β€” making the Xeon w9-3495X the 44.5% better value option.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8570Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP
$9595
$5889-39%
Performance per Dollar
9.8
15.4+57%
Release Date
2023
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.