
Xeon Platinum 8368

Xeon Platinum 8570
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon Platinum 8570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon Platinum 8570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,381 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (57 MB vs 300 MB).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 65,000).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 300 MB vs 57 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8570 better than Xeon Platinum 8368?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon Platinum 8570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 65,000 (105.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 1,960, a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 18,960 (27.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76 | 56 / 112+47% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+14% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+426% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 92,054 | 93,722+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000 | 65,000+225% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000+32% | 18,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8368 was priced at $7214, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 came in at $9595. On launch pricing ($7214 vs $9595), Xeon Platinum 8368 was $2381 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 26.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7214-25% | $9595 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.8+31% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















