PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3495X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3495X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3495X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 72,560).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3495X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w9-3495X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,325 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3495X better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. Xeon w9-3495X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 262.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3495X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 105 MB versus 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3495X is the stronger fit. You are getting 262.8% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 56 cores and 112 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 84.2% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3495X is the better buy right now. Xeon w9-3495X comes in $1,325 cheaper on MSRP at $5,889 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 20.4% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3495X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 105 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 56 cores / 112 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3495X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

Xeon w9-3495X

The Xeon w9-3495X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 90,441 points. Launch price was $5,889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon w9-3495X offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon w9-3495X has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3495X — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon w9-3495X's 90,441 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 72,560 (113.6% advantage for the Xeon w9-3495X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 2,136, a 8.5% lead for the Xeon w9-3495X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 18,600 (29.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 105 MB on the Xeon w9-3495X.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3495X
Cores / Threads	38 / 76	56 / 112+47%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+41%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+26%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	57 MB (total)	105 MB+84%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Ice Lake-SP (2021)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	92,054+2%	90,441
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,000	72,560+263%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,961	2,136+9%
Geekbench 6 Multi	25,000+34%	18,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3495X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3495X — the Xeon w9-3495X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3495X) — the Xeon w9-3495X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and W790 (Xeon w9-3495X).

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3495X
Socket	LGA4189	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4096 GB
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	112+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs true (Xeon w9-3495X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon w9-3495X targets Ultimate Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w9-3495X rivals Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3495X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true
Target Use	Server	Ultimate Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8368 was priced at $7214, while the Xeon w9-3495X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($7214 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3495X was $1325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3495X — making the Xeon w9-3495X the 18.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon Platinum 8368	Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP	$7214	$5889-18%
Performance per Dollar	12.8	15.4+20%
Release Date	2021	2023

Search Xeon Platinum 8368 on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3495X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.