Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 270W instead of 385W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3595X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 130,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,325 less on MSRP ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌42.6% higher power demand at 385W vs 270W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than Xeon Platinum 8368?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.
Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368 scores 92,054 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 5.8% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,000 vs 130,000 (146.7% advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,961 vs 2,300, a 15.9% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 17,118 (37.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368 vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76 | 60 / 120+58% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+41% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total) | 112.5 MB+97% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 92,054 | 97,534+6% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,000 | 130,000+550% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,961 | 2,300+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000+46% | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8368 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the Xeon w9-3595X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 112+75% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368) vs true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server, Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Server | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Xeon Platinum 8368 was priced at $7214, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($7214 vs $5889), Xeon w9-3595X was $1325 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368 delivers 12.8 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Xeon w9-3595X the 25.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368 | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7214 | $5889-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.8 | 16.6+30% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon Platinum 8368 and Xeon w9-3595X
