EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8368

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9754

128 Cores256 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

Buy on Amazon

Xeon Platinum 8368

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9754

128 / 256

98,450

+6.9%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8368

38 / 76

92,054

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8368 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8368: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅+422.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+349.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 57 MB).
✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8368 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 360W vs 270W.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,686 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 360W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 104,584).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (57 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 9754 moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8368 better than EPYC 9754?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8368 is ahead with a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 pulls ahead with 422.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. EPYC 9754 also has the bigger cache pool with 349.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 is the stronger fit. You are getting 422.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 349.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better buy right now. Xeon Platinum 8368 comes in $4,686 cheaper on MSRP at $7,214 MSRP versus $11,900 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9754 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 422.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 54.2% better value on MSRP (12.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9754 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 349.1% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 57 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 128 cores / 256 threads instead of 38/76. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8368 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 90 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368 (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 6.7% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 20,000 (135.8% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 1,961, a 18.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 25,000 (39.1% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+237%	38 / 76
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock	2.25 GHz	2.4 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+349%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	98,450+7%	92,054
Cinebench R23 Multi	104,584+423%	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,634	1,961+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,825	25,000+49%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9754 versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the EPYC 9754 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9754) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the EPYC 9754 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	SP5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB	6 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Native	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9754 was priced at $11900, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 came in at $7214. On launch pricing ($11900 vs $7214), Xeon Platinum 8368 was $4686 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 42.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP	$11900	$7214-39%
Performance per Dollar	8.3	12.8+54%
Release Date	2023	2021

Search EPYC 9754 on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8368 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.