
EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8368

EPYC 9375F

Xeon Platinum 8368
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9375F
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8368
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($429) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+313%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($108) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($429) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Xeon Platinum 8368

EPYC 9375F
The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Xeon Platinum 8368
The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 4% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,961, a 41.3% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 25,000 (4% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 38 / 76+19% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+41% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.85 GHz+60% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+349% | 57 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 95,768+4% | 92,054 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 20,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,981+52% | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,020+4% | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6000 on the EPYC 9375F versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the EPYC 9375F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 6 TB of RAM. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the EPYC 9375F offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB | 6 TB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Data Center / Frequency Optimized | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 debuted at $7214. At current prices ($108 vs $429), the EPYC 9375F is $321 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 886.7 pts/$ vs 214.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the EPYC 9375F the 122.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9375F | Xeon Platinum 8368 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5306-26% | $7214 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $108-75% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 886.7+313% | 214.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













