PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-2275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-2275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅+10.5% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Costs $962 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 641.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 140W instead of 165W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,000 vs 21,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2195 better than Xeon W-2275?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-2275 is ahead with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 pulls ahead with 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon W-2195 also has the bigger cache pool with 28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the stronger fit. You are getting 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.6% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2195 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-2195 comes in $962 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $1,112 MSRP, and it still gives you 10.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The compromise is that Xeon W-2275 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 641.4% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 25.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-2275 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon W-2195 vs Xeon W-2275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon W-2195 packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Xeon W-2275 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon W-2195 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W-2195 scores 27,977 against the Xeon W-2275's 27,974 — a 0% lead for the Xeon W-2195. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 19,000 (10% advantage for the Xeon W-2195). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,300 vs 1,596, a 20.4% lead for the Xeon W-2275 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,002 vs 11,000 (9.5% advantage for the Xeon W-2275). L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195 vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275.

Feature	Xeon W-2195	Xeon W-2275
Cores / Threads	18 / 36+29%	14 / 28
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	24.75 MB (total)+29%	19.25 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)	—
PassMark	27,977	27,974
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000+11%	19,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300	1,596+23%
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,002	11,000+10%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-2195 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2275 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2195 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2275 — the Xeon W-2275 supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 512 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C422 (Xeon W-2195) and C422 (Xeon W-2275).

Feature	Xeon W-2195	Xeon W-2275
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	512 GB	1024 GB+100%
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	48	48

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis, Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X; Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.

Feature	Xeon W-2195	Xeon W-2275
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis	Professional Content Creation / VFX

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon W-2195 was priced at $150, while the Xeon W-2275 came in at $1112. On launch pricing ($150 vs $1112), Xeon W-2195 was $962 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-2195 delivers 186.5 pts/$ vs 25.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2275 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 152.5% better value option.

Feature	Xeon W-2195	Xeon W-2275
MSRP	$150-87%	$1112
Performance per Dollar	186.5+640%	25.2
Release Date	2017	2019

Search Xeon W-2195 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.