
Xeon W-2275 vs Core i5-10400F

Xeon W-2275

Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-2275
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-2275 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($500) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-2275 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+128%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($500) | ✅ More affordable ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-2275 and Core i5-10400F

Xeon W-2275
The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-2275 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-2275 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W-2275 scores 27,974 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 72.9% lead for the Xeon W-2275. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,000 vs 8,191 (79.5% advantage for the Xeon W-2275). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,596 vs 1,454, a 9.3% lead for the Xeon W-2275 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 5,783 (62.2% advantage for the Xeon W-2275). L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Xeon W-2275 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+14% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB+60% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 27,974+115% | 13,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000+132% | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,596+10% | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000+90% | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-2275 uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon W-2275 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon W-2275) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon W-2275) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Xeon W-2275 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C422 (Xeon W-2275) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Xeon W-2275 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB+700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+200% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-2275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon W-2275 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation / VFX | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-2275 launched at $1112 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($500 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $398 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-2275 delivers 55.9 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 78.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-2275 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1112 | $160-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $102-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.9 | 127.7+128% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















