Xeon W-2275 vs Xeon W-3323

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon W-2275 vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon W-2275 vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon W-2275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.2 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($1,112 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).

Xeon W-3323

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($949 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 16.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 25.2 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $1,112 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2275 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 27,974).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-2275 better than Xeon W-3323?

Yes. Xeon W-2275 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-2275 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2275 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-2275 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3323 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon W-2275 comes in 17.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,112 MSRP versus $949 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3323 is also 16.5% better value on MSRP (29.3 vs 25.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3323 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon W-2275 vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W-2275

The Xeon W-2275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,974 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3323

The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon W-2275 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-2275 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2275 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2275 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3323 is built on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W-2275 scores 27,974 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-2275. L3 cache: 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2275 vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.

Feature	Xeon W-2275	Xeon W-3323
Cores / Threads	14 / 28+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+23%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	19.25 MB+7%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	—	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	27,974	27,822
Cinebench R23 Multi	19,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,596	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-2275 uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon W-2275	Xeon W-3323
Socket	LGA2066	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	1024 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	48	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2275) / not specified (Xeon W-3323). Primary use case: Xeon W-2275 targets Professional Content Creation / VFX. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2275 rivals Core i9-10940X.

Feature	Xeon W-2275	Xeon W-3323
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Professional Content Creation / VFX	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon W-2275 was priced at $1112, while the Xeon W-3323 came in at $949. On launch pricing ($1112 vs $949), Xeon W-3323 was $163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-2275 delivers 25.2 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Xeon W-3323 the 15.3% better value option.

Feature	Xeon W-2275	Xeon W-3323
MSRP	$1112	$949-15%
Performance per Dollar	25.2	29.3+16%
Release Date	2019	2021

Search Xeon W-2275 on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3323 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.