
Xeon W-3245M vs Core 9 270H

Xeon W-3245M

Core 9 270H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3245M
Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3245M | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5,002) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3245M | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5,002) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3245M and Core 9 270H

Xeon W-3245M
The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

Core 9 270H
The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3245M packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core 9 270H offers 14 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M versus 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon W-3245M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 9 270H uses Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3245M scores 28,494 against the Core 9 270H's 28,793 — a 1% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 16,500 (11.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,474 vs 2,800, a 62% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,572 vs 14,000 (19% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M vs 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H.
| Feature | Xeon W-3245M | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+14% | 14 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.8 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+19% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 24 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,494 | 28,793+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500+12% | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,474 | 2,800+90% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,572 | 14,000+21% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3245M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 9 270H uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M versus DDR5-6400 on the Core 9 270H — the Core 9 270H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3245M) vs 2 (Core 9 270H). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3245M) vs 20 (Core 9 270H) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3245M) and Mobile platform (Core 9 270H).
| Feature | Xeon W-3245M | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+2033% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+220% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 9 270H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H). The Core 9 270H includes integrated graphics (Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro, Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H.
| Feature | Xeon W-3245M | Core 9 270H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Workstation / Mac Pro | Extreme Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















