PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon W-3245M vs Xeon w3-2525 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon W-3245M vs Xeon w3-2525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,474 vs 2,000).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,572 vs 15,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 47.0 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $609 MSRP).
❌17.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 175W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w3-2525

2024

Why buy it

✅+35.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $4,393 less on MSRP ($609 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 725.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.0 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($609 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 175W instead of 205W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w3-2525 better than Xeon W-3245M?

Yes. Xeon w3-2525 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 29.6% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w3-2525 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w3-2525 is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w3-2525 is the better buy right now. Xeon w3-2525 comes in $4,393 cheaper on MSRP at $609 MSRP versus $5,002 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 725.6% better value on MSRP (47.0 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w3-2525 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon W-3245M vs Xeon w3-2525 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

Xeon w3-2525

The Xeon w3-2525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,641 points. Launch price was $609.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3245M packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w3-2525 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2525 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245M (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3245M uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3245M scores 28,494 against the Xeon w3-2525's 28,641 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon w3-2525. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,474 vs 2,000, a 30.3% lead for the Xeon w3-2525 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,572 vs 15,000 (25.8% advantage for the Xeon w3-2525). L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2525.

Feature	Xeon W-3245M	Xeon w3-2525
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+2%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	22 MB	22.5 MB+2%
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	28,494	28,641
Cinebench R23 Multi	18,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,474	2,000+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,572	15,000+30%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-3245M uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2525 — the Xeon w3-2525 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2048 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3245M) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2525). Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3245M) and W790 (Xeon w3-2525).

Feature	Xeon W-3245M	Xeon w3-2525
Socket	LGA3647	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR5-4400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	2 TB
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w3-2525). Primary use case: Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro, Xeon w3-2525 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon w3-2525 rivals Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.

Feature	Xeon W-3245M	Xeon w3-2525
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon W-3245M was priced at $5002, while the Xeon w3-2525 came in at $609. On launch pricing ($5002 vs $609), Xeon w3-2525 was $4393 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3245M delivers 5.7 pts/$ vs 47.0 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2525 — making the Xeon w3-2525 the 156.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon W-3245M	Xeon w3-2525
MSRP	$5002	$609-88%
Performance per Dollar	5.7	47.0+725%
Release Date	2019	2024

Search Xeon W-3245M on Amazon

Search Xeon w3-2525 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.