Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon W-3245M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Draws 110W instead of 205W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,500).

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌86.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Xeon D-2795NT?

Yes. Xeon W-3245M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 30.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 0.1% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 30.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the stronger fit. You are getting 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3245M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $5,002 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 30.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2795NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2795NT packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 39% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245M (base: 2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon W-3245M is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2795NT scores 28,463 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 18,500 (20.9% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,474, a 28.4% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 11,572 (2.8% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	20 / 40+25%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4.6 GHz+48%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.2 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	30 MB+36%	22 MB
L2 Cache	—	16 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	28,463	28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	18,500+23%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962+33%	1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,898+3%	11,572

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2795NT uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2933 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	FCBGA2579	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	1024 GB	2048 GB+100%
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	32	64+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Networking / Edge Computing / SoC	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro