Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Gold 6148

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Gold 6148 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Gold 6148: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6148 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 18,500).

Xeon Gold 6148

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $3,072 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6148 better than Xeon D-2795NT?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6148 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 2.0% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6148 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6148 is the stronger fit. You are getting 23.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6148 is the better buy right now. Xeon Gold 6148 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $3,072 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2795NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Gold 6148 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6148

The Xeon Gold 6148 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,021 points. Launch price was $3,072.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon D-2795NT and Xeon Gold 6148 share an identical 20-core/40-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6148 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6148 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2795NT scores 28,463 against the Xeon Gold 6148's 29,021 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6148. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 18,500 (20.9% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6148). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,254, a 44% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 9,445 (23% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6148.

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon Gold 6148
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	30 MB+9%	27.5 MB
L2 Cache	—	20 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	28,463	29,021+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	18,500+23%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962+56%	1,254
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,898+26%	9,445

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2795NT uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6148 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6148 — the Xeon D-2795NT supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6148). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6148) — the Xeon Gold 6148 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6148).

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon Gold 6148
Socket	FCBGA2579	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	1024 GB+33%	768 GB
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	32	48+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6148). Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC, Xeon Gold 6148 targets Legacy Enterprise Workloads. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon Gold 6148 rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon Gold 6148
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Networking / Edge Computing / SoC	Legacy Enterprise Workloads