Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Platinum 8160

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Platinum 8160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Platinum 8160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (28,463 vs 28,989).

Xeon Platinum 8160

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8160 better than Xeon D-2795NT?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8160 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8160 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8160 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon Platinum 8160 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2795NT makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon Platinum 8160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon D-2795NT packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8160 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8160 is built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2795NT scores 28,463 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon Platinum 8160
Cores / Threads	20 / 40	24 / 48+20%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	30 MB	33 MB+10%
L2 Cache	—	24 MB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	28,463	28,989+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,898	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon D-2795NT uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Xeon D-2795NT supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).

Feature	Xeon D-2795NT	Xeon Platinum 8160
Socket	FCBGA2579	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+10%	2666
Max RAM Capacity	1024 GB+33%	768 GB
RAM Channels	4	6+50%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	32	48+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.