
Xeon D-2795NT

Xeon w3-2525
Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon w3-2525 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon w3-2525 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon w3-2525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 175W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w3-2525 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (11,898 vs 15,000).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2525
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 32) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $609 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌59.1% higher power demand at 175W vs 110W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w3-2525 better than Xeon D-2795NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-2795NT vs Xeon w3-2525 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w3-2525
The Xeon w3-2525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,641 points. Launch price was $609.
Processing Power
The Xeon D-2795NT packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon w3-2525 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2525 — a 36.8% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2525 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon w3-2525 is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon D-2795NT scores 28,463 against the Xeon w3-2525's 28,641 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon w3-2525. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,000, a 1.9% lead for the Xeon w3-2525 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 15,000 (23.1% advantage for the Xeon w3-2525). L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2525.
| Feature | Xeon D-2795NT | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.5 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB+33% | 22.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | — | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,463 | 28,641 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,000+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898 | 15,000+26% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon D-2795NT uses the FCBGA2579 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2525 — the Xeon w3-2525 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w3-2525 supports up to 2 TB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2525) — the Xeon w3-2525 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT) and W790 (Xeon w3-2525).
| Feature | Xeon D-2795NT | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2579 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4400+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 2 TB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 32 | 64+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC, Xeon w3-2525 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302; Xeon w3-2525 rivals Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Xeon D-2795NT | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC | Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














