
Core 9 270H vs Xeon D-2795NT

Core 9 270H

Xeon D-2795NT
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 9 270H
Performance Per Dollar Xeon D-2795NT
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 9 270H | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 9 270H | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Xeon D-2795NT

Core 9 270H
The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.

Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 60.7% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core 9 270H is built on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 9 270H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 15,000 (9.5% advantage for the Core 9 270H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 1,962, a 35.2% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,898 (16.2% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.
| Feature | Core 9 270H | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 20 / 40+43% |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+87% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+35% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 30 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 28,793+1% | 28,463 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500+10% | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+43% | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000+18% | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core 9 270H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the Core 9 270H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 9 270H) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core 9 270H) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).
| Feature | Core 9 270H | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 1024 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 32+60% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 9 270H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon D-2795NT supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core 9 270H includes integrated graphics (Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs)), while the Xeon D-2795NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Core 9 270H | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming Laptop | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















