Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon W-3245M

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 7 8845HS

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3245M

16 Cores32 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon W-3245M Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 8845HS

8 / 16

28,470

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon W-3245M

16 / 32

28,494

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8845HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 205W, a 160W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-3245M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,500 vs 18,500).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅+5.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌355.6% higher power demand at 205W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8845HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8845HS better than Xeon W-3245M?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3245M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8845HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 37.5% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8845HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3245M is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 8845HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $5,002 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3245M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 5.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon W-3245M is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8845HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 28,470 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 18,500 (5.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,500 vs 1,474, a 51.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,250 vs 11,572 (5.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+11%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+19%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	22 MB+38%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	16 MB+1500%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	28,470	28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi	17,500	18,500+6%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,500+70%	1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,250+6%	11,572

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 7 8845HS versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports 155.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 8845HS) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	FP8	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-7500+156%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). The Ryzen 7 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8845HS	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon 780M	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V (SVM)	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro