
Ryzen 7 8845HS

Xeon Platinum 8160
Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon Platinum 8160 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (28,470 vs 28,989).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8160
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8845HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8845HS moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8845HS better than Xeon Platinum 8160?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Xeon Platinum 8160 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Platinum 8160
The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8845HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 28,470 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8845HS | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+38% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 33 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 24 MB+2300% |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 28,470 | 28,989+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8845HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-7500 on the Ryzen 7 8845HS versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Ryzen 7 8845HS supports 181.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 7 8845HS) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8845HS | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500+181% | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 768 GB+200% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). The Ryzen 7 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8845HS | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













