Xeon W-3275
VS
Core i9-13900HX

Xeon W-3275 vs Core i9-13900HX

Intel

Xeon W-3275

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Core i9-13900HX

24 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275

#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
112%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
110%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
110%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
109%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
109%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
108%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
108%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
107%
#493
Xeon Platinum 8570
MSRP: $9595|Avg: $9595
105%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
104%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
103%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
102%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
102%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
101%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
100%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
99%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
99%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
98%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
98%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
97%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
96%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
92%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
91%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
90%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
89%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
89%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
89%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
89%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
88%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900HX

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
105%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
104%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
103%
#89
Core i9-13900HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
92%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,550) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-3275 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-3275Core i9-13900HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13900HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($1,550 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-3275Core i9-13900HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275 and Core i9-13900HX

Intel

Xeon W-3275

The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.

Intel

Core i9-13900HX

The Core i9-13900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,437 points. Launch price was $668.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3275 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Core i9-13900HX offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HX — a 16% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Xeon W-3275 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-13900HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275 scores 41,267 against the Core i9-13900HX's 42,437 — a 2.8% lead for the Core i9-13900HX. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HX.

FeatureXeon W-3275Core i9-13900HX
Cores / Threads
28 / 56+17%
24 / 32
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.4 GHz+17%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
38.5 MB+7%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
28 MB+1300%
2 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
PassMark
41,267
42,437+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi
29,493
Geekbench 6 Single
2,878
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,944
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-3275 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-13900HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 versus DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-13900HX — the Xeon W-3275 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 192 GB 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275) vs 2 (Core i9-13900HX). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275) vs 20 (Core i9-13900HX) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3275) and HM770,WM790 (Core i9-13900HX).

FeatureXeon W-3275Core i9-13900HX
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA1964
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
3200+63900%
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
1024
192 GB+19660700%
RAM Channels
6+200%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64+220%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-13900HX). The Core i9-13900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3275 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900HX targets Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X; Core i9-13900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.

FeatureXeon W-3275Core i9-13900HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Performance Gaming / Mobile Workstation