Xeon W-3275 vs Core i5-13400F
Xeon W-3275
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+422%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F
Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3275 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275 scores 41,267 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 49% lead for the Xeon W-3275. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+180% | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB+93% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+2140% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 41,267+65% | 25,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,407 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,408 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Xeon W-3275 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3275) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 192 GB+19660700% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+220% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3275 launched at $4449 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($1550 vs $180), the Core i5-13400F is $1370 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3275 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 135.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4449 | $196-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1550 | $180-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 139.1+423% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275 and Core i5-13400F
