Xeon W-3275 vs M3 Max 16-Core
Xeon W-3275
M3 Max 16-Core
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 16-Core
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3275 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3275 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3275 and M3 Max 16-Core
Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
M3 Max 16-Core
The M3 Max 16-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 41,257 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3275 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the M3 Max 16-Core offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 16-Core — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3275 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Xeon W-3275 is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275 scores 41,267 against the M3 Max 16-Core's 41,257 — a 0% lead for the Xeon W-3275.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+75% | 16 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+13% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.748 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 41,267 | 41,257 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3275 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M3 Max 16-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 versus 6400 on the M3 Max 16-Core — the M3 Max 16-Core supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 128 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275) vs 4 (M3 Max 16-Core). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3275) vs 0 (M3 Max 16-Core) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3275) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 16-Core).
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 6400+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024+700% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 6+50% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3275 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 16-Core). The M3 Max 16-Core includes integrated graphics (Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core)), while the Xeon W-3275 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X; M3 Max 16-Core rivals Core i9-13950HX.
| Feature | Xeon W-3275 | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W-3275 and M3 Max 16-Core
