PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon W-3275 vs Xeon w5-2545 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon W-3275 vs Xeon w5-2545: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon W-3275

2019

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Draws 205W instead of 210W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 45.9 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $889 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-2545 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-2545

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,560 less on MSRP ($889 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 394.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.9 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($889 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (40,782 vs 41,267).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 39 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-2545 better than Xeon W-3275?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w5-2545 is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3275 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Xeon W-3275 also has the bigger cache pool with 28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3275 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-2545 is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-2545 comes in $3,560 cheaper on MSRP at $889 MSRP versus $4,449 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3275 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 394.6% better value on MSRP (45.9 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2545 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon W-3275 vs Xeon w5-2545 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon W-3275

The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.

Xeon w5-2545

The Xeon w5-2545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 40,782 points. Launch price was $889.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3275 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon w5-2545 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-2545 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-2545 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3275 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3275 scores 41,267 against the Xeon w5-2545's 40,782 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-3275. L3 cache: 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275 vs 30 MB on the Xeon w5-2545.

Feature	Xeon W-3275	Xeon w5-2545
Cores / Threads	28 / 56+133%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.7 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
L3 Cache	38.5 MB+28%	30 MB
L2 Cache	28 MB+1300%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	41,267+1%	40,782

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-3275 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-2545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2545 — the Xeon w5-2545 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2545 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1024 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3275) vs 4 (Xeon w5-2545). Both provide 64 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon W-3275) and W790 (Xeon w5-2545).

Feature	Xeon W-3275	Xeon w5-2545
Socket	LGA3647	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	3200	4800+50%
Max RAM Capacity	1024	2048+100%
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	64	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-2545 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X; Xeon w5-2545 rivals Threadripper 7960X.

Feature	Xeon W-3275	Xeon w5-2545
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon W-3275 was priced at $4449, while the Xeon w5-2545 came in at $889. On launch pricing ($4449 vs $889), Xeon w5-2545 was $3560 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3275 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 45.9 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2545 — making the Xeon w5-2545 the 132.7% better value option.

Feature	Xeon W-3275	Xeon w5-2545
MSRP	$4449	$889-80%
Performance per Dollar	9.3	45.9+394%
Release Date	2019	2024

Search Xeon W-3275 on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-2545 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.