
Xeon w7-3565X vs EPYC 9274F

Xeon w7-3565X

EPYC 9274F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3565X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9274F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,850) | ✅ More affordable ($2,490) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+19%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,850) | ✅ More affordable ($2,490) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-3565X and EPYC 9274F

Xeon w7-3565X
The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.

EPYC 9274F
The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.
Processing Power
The Xeon w7-3565X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 9274F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3565X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X versus 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.05 GHz). The Xeon w7-3565X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9274F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-3565X scores 70,982 against the EPYC 9274F's 73,982 — a 4.1% lead for the EPYC 9274F. L3 cache: 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.05 GHz+62% |
| L3 Cache | 82.5 MB | 256 MB (total)+210% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 70,982 | 73,982+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,812 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-3565X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9274F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3565X versus 4800 on the EPYC 9274F — the EPYC 9274F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-3565X) vs 12 (EPYC 9274F). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) vs 128 (EPYC 9274F) — the EPYC 9274F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w7-3565X) and SP5 (EPYC 9274F).
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+69904967% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 | 128+14% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w7-3565X) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X; EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w7-3565X launched at $2689 MSRP, while the EPYC 9274F debuted at $3060. At current prices ($2850 vs $2490), the EPYC 9274F is $360 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w7-3565X delivers 24.9 pts/$ vs 29.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9274F — making the EPYC 9274F the 17.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9274F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2689-12% | $3060 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2850 | $2490-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9 | 29.7+19% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















