
Xeon w7-3565X vs EPYC 9384X

Xeon w7-3565X

EPYC 9384X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3565X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9384X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,850) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa-X (2023) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+44%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,850) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,157) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-3565X and EPYC 9384X

Xeon w7-3565X
The Xeon w7-3565X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 335 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 70,982 points. Launch price was $2,689.

EPYC 9384X
The EPYC 9384X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 72,121 points. Launch price was $5,529.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon w7-3565X and EPYC 9384X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3565X versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9384X — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3565X (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon w7-3565X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9384X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-3565X scores 70,982 against the EPYC 9384X's 72,121 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 9384X. L3 cache: 82.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3565X vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+23% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 82.5 MB | 768 MB (total)+831% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 70,982 | 72,121+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,812 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-3565X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9384X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3565X versus 4800 on the EPYC 9384X — the EPYC 9384X supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9384X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-3565X) vs 12 (EPYC 9384X). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-3565X) vs 128 (EPYC 9384X) — the EPYC 9384X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w7-3565X) and SP5 (EPYC 9384X).
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+69904967% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 | 128+14% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3565X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w7-3565X) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9384X). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3565X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X; EPYC 9384X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w7-3565X launched at $2689 MSRP, while the EPYC 9384X debuted at $5529. At current prices ($2850 vs $4157), the Xeon w7-3565X is $1307 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w7-3565X delivers 24.9 pts/$ vs 17.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9384X — making the Xeon w7-3565X the 35.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3565X | EPYC 9384X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2689-51% | $5529 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2850-31% | $4157 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.9+44% | 17.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















