
Xeon w9-3575X vs EPYC 7713P

Xeon w9-3575X

EPYC 7713P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3575X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7713P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($675) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,443) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+266%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($675) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,443) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 7713P

Xeon w9-3575X
The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.

EPYC 7713P
The EPYC 7713P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 81,582 points. Launch price was $5,010.
Processing Power
The Xeon w9-3575X packs 44 cores / 88 threads, while the EPYC 7713P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7713P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7713P — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3575X (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon w9-3575X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7713P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Xeon w9-3575X scores 82,507 against the EPYC 7713P's 81,582 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X. L3 cache: 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7713P.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 44 / 88 | 64 / 128+45% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.68 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 97.5 MB | 256 MB (total)+163% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 82,507+1% | 81,582 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 60,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,320 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w9-3575X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7713P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X versus 3200 on the EPYC 7713P — the EPYC 7713P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) vs 128 (EPYC 7713P) — the EPYC 7713P offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w9-3575X) and SP3 (EPYC 7713P).
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 | 128+14% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon w9-3575X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w9-3575X) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7713P). Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X; EPYC 7713P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, SEV |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w9-3575X launched at $3789 MSRP, while the EPYC 7713P debuted at $5010. At current prices ($675 vs $2443), the Xeon w9-3575X is $1768 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w9-3575X delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 33.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7713P — making the Xeon w9-3575X the 114.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 7713P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3789-24% | $5010 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $675-72% | $2443 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+266% | 33.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















