Xeon w9-3575X vs EPYC 9275F
Xeon w9-3575X
EPYC 9275F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w9-3575X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9275F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($675) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+397%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($675) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 9275F
Xeon w9-3575X
The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
Processing Power
The Xeon w9-3575X packs 44 cores / 88 threads, while the EPYC 9275F offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w9-3575X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X versus 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Xeon w9-3575X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9275F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w9-3575X scores 82,507 against the EPYC 9275F's 84,620 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 9275F. L3 cache: 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 44 / 88+83% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz+86% |
| L3 Cache | 97.5 MB | 256 MB (total)+163% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 82,507 | 84,620+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 60,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,320 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w9-3575X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9275F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X versus 6000 on the EPYC 9275F — the EPYC 9275F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w9-3575X) vs 12 (EPYC 9275F). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) vs 128 (EPYC 9275F) — the EPYC 9275F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w9-3575X) and SP5 (EPYC 9275F).
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 6000+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+69904967% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112 | 128+14% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w9-3575X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w9-3575X) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F). Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X; EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w9-3575X launched at $3789 MSRP, while the EPYC 9275F debuted at $3439. At current prices ($675 vs $3439), the Xeon w9-3575X is $2764 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w9-3575X delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the EPYC 9275F — making the Xeon w9-3575X the 133% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w9-3575X | EPYC 9275F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3789 | $3439-9% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $675-80% | $3439 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+397% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon w9-3575X and EPYC 9275F
