A10-7300 vs Core i5-12400F

CPU

GPU

A10-7300

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-7300 vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum

A10-7300

4 / 4

1,736

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

+1025.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7300 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7300 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7300

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,736 vs 19,532).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FP3, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +392.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 869.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP3 and older memory support.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-7300.

Trade-offs

❌
16% HIGHER MSRP
$174 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than A10-7300?

Yes. Core i5-12400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 392.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1025.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-12400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 392.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-12400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1025.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 16.0% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 392.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 869.9% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2014), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FP3, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A10-7300 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7300

The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7300 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-7300 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7300 scores 1,736 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 167.4% lead for the Core i5-12400F.

Feature	A10-7300	Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4.4 GHz+38%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.5 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	—	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+220%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm	Intel 7 nm-75%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	1,736	19,532+1025%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,380
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7300 uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7300) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7300) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

Feature	A10-7300	Core i5-12400F
Socket	FP3	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+200%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7300) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	A10-7300	Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon R6	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Laptop	Gaming Performance/Value

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-7300 was priced at $150, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($150 vs $174), A10-7300 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7300 delivers 11.6 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 162.6% better value option.

Feature	A10-7300	Core i5-12400F
MSRP	$150-14%	$174
Performance per Dollar	11.6	112.3+868%
Release Date	2014	2022

Search A10-7300 on Amazon

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.