A10-7890K
Core i5-10400F
A10-7890K vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-7890K vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-7890K vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-7890K
2016Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,537 vs 13,029).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +121.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while A10-7890K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7890K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than A10-7890K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-7890K vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A10-7890K
The A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,537 points. Launch price was $150.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The A10-7890K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-7890K versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-7890K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7890K scores 3,537 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 114.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 1,454, a 83.2% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7890K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | A10-7890K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+38% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 3,537 | 13,029+268% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 600 | 1,454+142% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7890K versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7890K) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | A10-7890K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the A10-7890K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7890K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The A10-7890K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7890K targets Budget, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A10-7890K rivals Core i3-6100; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | A10-7890K | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-7890K and Core i5-10400F
