
A10-9700
Popular choices:

Core i3-8130U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A10-9700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-8130U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i3-8130U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Core i3-8130U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,521 vs 3,555).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700.
A10-9700
2017Core i3-8130U
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-8130U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i3-8130U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,521 vs 3,555).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-9700 better than Core i3-8130U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9700 and Core i3-8130U

A10-9700
A10-9700
The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i3-8130U
Core i3-8130U
The Core i3-8130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,521 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-8130U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-8130U — a 11.1% clock advantage for the A10-9700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-8130U uses Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Core i3-8130U's 3,521 — a 1% lead for the A10-9700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 642 vs 1,050, a 48.2% lead for the Core i3-8130U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8130U.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+59% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,555 | 3,521 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 642 | 1,050+64% |
Memory & Platform
The A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-8130U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The A10-9700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 12 (Core i3-8130U) — the Core i3-8130U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 12+50% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8130U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-9700) and UHD Graphics 620 (Core i3-8130U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget, Core i3-8130U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560; Core i3-8130U rivals Ryzen 3 2200U.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Core i3-8130U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | UHD Graphics 620 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget | Mainstream Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













