A10-9700 vs Core i3-8130U

AMD

A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i3-8130U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

A10-9700

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-8130U.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i3-8130U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Core i3-8130U

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • 50% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-9700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,521 vs 3,555).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-9700.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9700 better than Core i3-8130U?
Yes. A10-9700 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 18.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A10-9700 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 18.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700 is the better fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A10-9700 is the smarter buy today. A10-9700 is at an unclear MSRP at $169 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 18.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-9700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetA10-9700Core i3-8130U
1080p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS80 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS86 FPS
ultra75 FPS67 FPS
4K
low64 FPS69 FPS
medium57 FPS58 FPS
high45 FPS44 FPS
ultra35 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetA10-9700Core i3-8130U
1080p
low89 FPS73 FPS
medium89 FPS65 FPS
high89 FPS61 FPS
ultra89 FPS45 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS61 FPS
medium89 FPS53 FPS
high89 FPS50 FPS
ultra89 FPS39 FPS
4K
low89 FPS43 FPS
medium89 FPS39 FPS
high89 FPS28 FPS
ultra68 FPS20 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetA10-9700Core i3-8130U
1080p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS88 FPS
4K
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS88 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetA10-9700Core i3-8130U
1080p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS88 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS88 FPS
4K
low89 FPS88 FPS
medium89 FPS88 FPS
high89 FPS88 FPS
ultra89 FPS88 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-9700 and Core i3-8130U

AMD

A10-9700

The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Core i3-8130U

The Core i3-8130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,521 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-8130U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i3-8130U — a 11.1% clock advantage for the A10-9700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-8130U uses Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Core i3-8130U's 3,521 — a 1% lead for the A10-9700. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 642 vs 1,050, a 48.2% lead for the Core i3-8130U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8130U.

FeatureA10-9700Core i3-8130U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+12%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+59%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019)
PassMark
3,555
3,521
Geekbench 6 Single
642
1,050+64%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-8130U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The A10-9700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 12 (Core i3-8130U) — the Core i3-8130U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA10-9700Core i3-8130U
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
8
12+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-8130U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A10-9700) and UHD Graphics 620 (Core i3-8130U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget, Core i3-8130U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560; Core i3-8130U rivals Ryzen 3 2200U.

FeatureA10-9700Core i3-8130U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
UHD Graphics 620
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Mainstream Laptop